sweet tweets

    the twits (or tweets)

    12.15.07

    on performance-enhancing, performance-enhancers, and the performance-enhanced

    Posted in goings on, sportsish at 12:02 am by electricvishnu

    why not just make every professional athlete take steroids . . . but the same exact amount [proportion to body weight, of course]

    none of this uneven playing field garbage: just clear the table of all these underachieving [might we add un-american] wimpy kids in the mlb who flat out refused to supply the baseball watching, flag waving, hot dog eating, sometimes pieces of corn get stuck in my teeth too patriots of this fine and awesome continental united states of america (plus the d.r. never forget the d.r.) with what they [and we: yes you too, hyper-literate and choking on your tongue in cheek faux-hawked reader] demand. america demands less waiting around, more home runs, bigger biceps, more aggression, more attitude, more spunk, a little less pastime, a little more bang for your buck, a little more nfl.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YphEUa5LPjM]
    [thank you g. carlin]

    so while vince mcmahon and co. took a gamble (and got burned) with the xfl, taking the athletotainment ad absurdum, major league baseball was in the midst of a subtle mega-beefing-up overhaul [yet, can one believe it ever was or will ever be subtle to pay for controlled substances with personal checks?] there’s a whole lot of juice to go around, and the report does not diminish any suspicions. upon watching a yankees game on one of those classic rerun glory days channels, this writer was struck by the apparent scrawniness of all the players, and the sluggers, just looked like the average schmo in the beer-softball league that can hit it past the fire house. somewhere along the lines [when the stakes got much higher, fueled by 1990s prosperity and

    • a ticket buying population that can now pay $20-something to sit in the bleachers, as opposed to the $6 of the past
    • advertising dollars coming in from everywhere, paying for billboards that have gone everywhere but the players uniforms (yet)

    so yes, we get the point: revenues get much higher, therefore the players that can perform at “major league” standards can demand much higher compensation for their work. the promise of much higher wages will often make it far more worthwhile to risk physical well-being and even social disdain from breaking the law (hazard pay to coal miners, window washers, bodyguards, drug smugglers, test pilots, and all the rest) we all know the physical hazards of taking steroids, but what of the social consequences. in major league baseball, while considered illegal (if not possessed with a legal prescription) there was no real testing, and the recent testing system seemingly leaves much to be desired. but it certainly is not in major league baseball’s great interest to find that one out of every five players is juiced up, is it? what would become of america’s great pastoral family friendly athletotainment? how would this bastion of non-violent day-at-the-park fun fare if it came to light that it’s social heroes are jabbing hypodermic needles into themselves to perform at such comic-book levels of greatness?

    can major league baseball ever go back?

    then there is only one way to go, which brings us back to our mitchell plan of commie-non-roid-taking containment. we’ll leave the national league to those natural tree-huggers and such. let them hit the weight room un-aided. (it’s sort of like letting people drive without their glasses or contacts in, right?) they can even rename it to the socialist league, or even the loving and accepting of all levels of physical prowess league. the american league belongs to the americans.  it will be like regular and decaf, coke and diet coke, bud and bud light, popeye and popeye sans spinach . . .

    and in the world series every year, we can reunite . . .   and also see the first triple digit one game run total in the game’s history.

    12.13.07

    a little graph theory on a chilly day

    Posted in math at 6:39 pm by electricvishnu

    is the new york city subway map planar?

    in other words, is the simplified [i.e. if two or more different lines both travel directly from station A to station B (V(i) and V (j)) only one edge will be drawn] graph of the entire subway system planar, or does there exist a complete K5 or K3,3 sub-graph within?

    my guess is no; it would seem overly redundant (beyond a safely redundant threshold) to have any such subgraph . . .

    wikipedia’s article on planar graphs

    12.07.07

    Posted in goings on at 1:38 pm by electricvishnu

    firstly, i’d like to say off the bat that the perpetrator in the mall shootings is of no relation to me; it’s a very un-hawkins-ish thing to do [to say the very least.] and so opens up the latest country-wide dialogue on gun-control the violence crazed hopeless youth of america [cause: violent videogames and marilyn manson of course]

    is gun control the answer? [see post from april 17, 2007]

    is it lame to be self-referential these days?

    it’s a good thing our government is so open.

    12.06.07

    Posted in words at 6:56 pm by electricvishnu

    some mornings i prefer
    watching New change from York to Jers
    in the course of this simple verse
    one long picture slides past my window frame

    just take it all in:
    and imagine myself there
    on the outside, rather than in
    sitting
    writing
    at one
    with a sub-universe of rusted elegance
    from an exposed stairwell of concrete

    or on a kayak, navigating the canals of Newark

    there’s snow in the sand traps, and it gets a little harder to remember cold days of fall

    12.03.07

    dans le jour froid en automne

    Posted in goings on, words at 6:48 pm by electricvishnu

    doves are underrated: as one reviewer put it, “if coldplay did better drugs.”

    “some cities” are more frustratingly generic than others. new york is not one of them.

    i haven’t decided yet whether today is a cold day that’s refreshing or if it’s a cold day that’s just really cold.

    at least iran doesn’t have nukes yet, eh? that was really keeping me up at night.

    what of libertarian realism as a political ethos? [and that’s the other-l –word with a lowercase l]

    for the next presidential debate, i propose these rules:

    • all parties invited
    • limited to most popular 200 candidates (total) + one guest each
    • format: college house party
    • reality tv format [real world, big brother, etc,] televised highlights to be edited by either by automated software designed to key in on what people deem interesting / exciting, or a team of editors chosen to cancel out the others partiality
    • all footage will be available on the internet, however
    • party from 8pm – 8am
    • all conversations and content therein inadmissible in all courts of law [as well as limited immunity guaranteed with regards to all events at the party]
    • open bar